The download: what’s next for electricity and living in the conspiracy age

Today’s newsletter highlights new findings on the future of electricity from the International Energy Agency and explores a series on how conspiracies and generative Artificial Intelligence are reshaping politics and truth.

The newsletter opens with a look at the International Energy Agency’s latest World Energy Outlook, which takes stock of the current state of global energy and offers projections for electricity, grids, and climate impacts. The piece, highlighted by Casey Crownhart and carried in the spark newsletter, flags surprising figures and notable insights about how electricity systems may evolve as nations respond to climate pressures and shifting demand patterns.

The edition also promotes a new series, “The New Conspiracy Age,” which examines how conspiracy theories have penetrated the White House and how generative Artificial Intelligence is altering the fabric of truth. Subscribers are invited to a roundtable today at 1pm ET with features editor Amanda Silverman, executive editor Niall Firth, and conspiracy expert Mike Rothschild to discuss surviving and understanding this new information environment. The newsletter frames the series as a look at the human and institutional consequences when fringe ideas turn into policy and when technology changes how people perceive evidence.

A curated must-reads list covers a broad set of tech and policy stories. Top items include a report that the US president may seek authority to preempt state laws on Artificial Intelligence and give the justice department power to sue dissenting states; claims that the cdc is making false links between vaccines and autism while nih echoes similar messaging; china’s push into autonomous vehicles and heavy support for its electric vehicle industry; a deal between major music labels and the Artificial Intelligence streaming service Klay to remodel songs; and work on quantum sensors as a potential successor to gps. The list also touches on relationships with chatbots, progress toward a functional cure for hiv, efforts to counter long-term online harms, tourists fooled by an Artificial Intelligence-generated Christmas market image, and a feature on the Thwaites “doomsday” glacier and its risks to global sea levels. A lighter section closes with suggestions for small comforts and seasonal distractions.

60

Impact Score

Congress weighs Artificial Intelligence transparency rules

Bipartisan lawmakers are pushing a federal transparency standard for the largest Artificial Intelligence models as Congress works on a broader national framework. The proposal aims to increase public trust while avoiding stricter state-by-state requirements and heavier regulation.

Report finds California creative job losses are not driven by Artificial Intelligence

New research from Otis College of Art and Design finds California’s recent creative industry job losses stem from cost pressures and structural shifts, not direct worker displacement by generative Artificial Intelligence. The technology is changing workflows and expectations, but it is largely replacing tasks rather than entire jobs.

U.S. senators propose broader chip tool export ban for Chinese firms

A bipartisan proposal in the U.S. Senate would shift semiconductor equipment controls from specific fabs to targeted Chinese companies and their affiliates. The measure is aimed at cutting off access to advanced lithography and other wafer fabrication tools for firms such as Huawei, SMIC, YMTC, CXMT, and Hua Hong.

Trump executive order targets state Artificial Intelligence laws

Executive Order 14365 lays out a federal strategy to discourage, challenge, and potentially preempt state Artificial Intelligence laws viewed as burdensome. Employers are advised to keep complying with current state and local rules while preparing for regulatory uncertainty in 2026.

Who decides how America uses Artificial Intelligence in war

Stanford experts are divided over how the United States should govern Artificial Intelligence in defense, surveillance, and warfare. Their views converge on one point: decisions with such high stakes cannot be left to companies alone.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.