2026 banking and capital markets outlook

Deloitte’s outlook frames 2026 as a defining year for US banks as macro uncertainty, fee diversification, and the rise of stablecoins reshape revenue and liquidity dynamics. Banks must also industrialize Artificial Intelligence and modernize data foundations while strengthening tech-enabled defenses against increasingly sophisticated financial crime.

2026 appears likely to be a defining year for US banks. Deloitte outlines a baseline macro scenario in which GDP growth moderates to about 1.4 percent and inflation and labor market dynamics could test consumer spending. Banks enter the year with relatively strong capital positions, but they may face headwinds to net interest income from lower rates even as deposit costs decline. Fee-based income, wealth management, and investment banking could help offset modest lending and payments pressures, while commercial real estate and corporate lending show signs of stabilization amid continued competition from nonbank lenders.

The payments landscape is at an inflection point because of regulated stablecoins. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, known as the GENIUS Act, establishes a framework for payment stablecoins and opens doorways for banks to issue, custody, process, or partner on tokenized solutions. Tokenized deposits offer a bank-regulated alternative with native cash settlement and interest characteristics, and some large banks are already piloting such products. Regulators are expected to publish implementing rules ahead of a July 2026 timeline that will shape how payment stablecoins and related services integrate into banking and payments rails.

Artificial Intelligence is another central theme. Deloitte argues that moving beyond isolated pilots to enterprise-scale deployment will require a unified vision, stronger governance, clear ownership, disciplined build-versus-buy decisions, and rigorous ROI measurement. Agentic Artificial Intelligence and industry-specific models promise significant productivity and capability gains, but success depends on AI-ready data: reliable, timely, broad, and tightly governed. Much of the necessary data work has been driven by regulatory compliance programs such as CCAR, DFAST, and AML, but those efforts often remain siloed and must be scaled into enterprise data platforms and productized data assets.

Finally, financial crime is rising in scale and sophistication, including new threats enabled by Artificial Intelligence and digital assets. Deloitte recommends a tech-enabled, intelligence-led approach that consolidates pipelines, embeds AI into detection and case workflows, and keeps humans in the loop for consequential decisions. As regulators adapt reporting and supervisory priorities, banks that modernize data, integrate controls across AML, sanctions, and fraud, and act decisively on stablecoins and Artificial Intelligence could gain a strategic advantage in 2026.

68

Impact Score

Microsoft emails show early doubts about OpenAI

Court emails show Microsoft executives were unconvinced by OpenAI’s early Artificial Intelligence progress in 2018 while also worrying that rejecting the lab could push it toward Amazon. The messages reveal internal tension between skepticism over technical claims and concern about competitive and public relations fallout.

Apple explores Intel chip manufacturing alliance

Apple has reached a preliminary agreement with Intel to manufacture some chips for its devices, reflecting mounting pressure on semiconductor supply chains as Artificial Intelligence demand absorbs advanced capacity. The move also aligns with Washington’s push to expand domestic chip production and revive Intel’s foundry business.

Why businesses must act now on agentic Artificial Intelligence risk

Businesses are moving from generative tools to autonomous Artificial Intelligence agents that can execute tasks with limited human input. That shift is creating urgent governance, security, and accountability risks, underscored by recent concerns around OpenClaw.

US signals proactive approach on Artificial Intelligence regulation

US federal and state agencies are showing signs of a more proactive stance on Artificial Intelligence oversight, especially around security. The shift contrasts with more sector-specific or horizontal regulatory models emerging in the UK, Europe, Singapore and Japan.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.