UK AI Safety Bill Delayed Amid US Influence

The UK's AI Safety Bill faces delays amid political maneuvers to align with US policies.

The United Kingdom’s highly anticipated AI Safety Bill has hit a roadblock, raising concerns about the government’s commitment to regulating artificial intelligence technologies. According to Chi Onwurah, the head of the Science, Innovation, and Technology Select Committee, the delay in pushing the legislation forward appears politically motivated. It is suspected that the delay aims to align more closely with the US, particularly the Trump administration’s stance against extensive AI regulation.

The bill initially aimed to legally compel companies to submit their frontier AI models for government safety evaluations, a promise made by firms like OpenAI and Google DeepMind during international talks. Despite technology secretary Peter Kyle’s assurance in November 2024 to implement the legislation, the expected release has been postponed, sparking concerns about the possible influence of international politics over national safety priorities.

This strategic shift towards innovation and economic growth raises questions. Some speculate that this might be a move to appease the US, which has criticized Europe’s regulatory approach as overly restrictive. The delay is reportedly part of broader efforts by the UK to strengthen ties with the US, which may carry significant economic implications. A Microsoft report forecasts that delays in AI integration could cost the UK economy over £150 billion in the coming years.

75

Impact Score

How Intel became central to America’s Artificial Intelligence strategy

The Trump administration took a 10 percent stake in Intel in exchange for early CHIPS Act funding, positioning the struggling chipmaker at the core of U.S. Artificial Intelligence ambitions. The high-stakes bet could reshape domestic manufacturing while raising questions about government overreach.

NextSilicon unveils processor chip to challenge Intel and AMD

Israeli startup NextSilicon is developing a RISC-V central processor to complement its Maverick-2 chip for precision scientific computing, positioning it against Intel and AMD and in competition with Nvidia’s systems. Sandia National Laboratories has been evaluating the technology as the company claims faster, lower power performance without code changes on some workloads.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.