US Court Revives CRISPR Patent Battle Between Doudna, Charpentier and Broad Institute

Ownership of foundational CRISPR gene-editing patents is back under scrutiny after a US court ruled Doudna and Charpentier deserve another shot at their claim.

The ongoing dispute over who owns the foundational patents for CRISPR gene-editing technology has been reignited following a recent decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On Monday, the court announced that Nobel laureates Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, widely credited for co-discovering the gene-editing tool, will have another opportunity to argue that they deserve key patents on what many view as the defining biotechnology invention of the 21st century.

Doudna and Charpentier, who shared a Nobel Prize in 2020 for their groundbreaking work on CRISPR, faced a setback when the Broad Institute’s Feng Zhang was awarded core US patent rights in 2014. This allocation sparked a protracted, high-stakes battle involving not only major financial interests but also scientific prestige. Despite their seminal 2012 publication showing CRISPR´s capacity to cut DNA in a test tube, the controversy centers around which group was the first to successfully apply CRISPR to edit DNA in animal cells, an achievement both parties claim from the same year.

In 2022, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board determined Doudna and Charpentier had not fully conceived the application of CRISPR in animal cells, in part because they struggled initially to make the technology work in various species. Broad´s Zhang, meanwhile, published a successful demonstration in human cells in 2013. On appeal, however, the Federal Circuit court found that the earlier ruling used an incorrect legal standard, holding that Doudna and Charpentier did not need certainty their invention would work, but rather that it did ultimately function as intended. With the case heading back to the patent board for reconsideration, both the University of California, Berkeley, and the Broad Institute have reaffirmed their positions. The dispute, involving reexamination of decade-old research notebooks and potential Supreme Court escalation, once again puts the future of CRISPR patent rights up for grabs and could reshape the control and commercialization of gene-editing therapies worldwide.

85

Impact Score

HMRC signs £175m Quantexa deal for fraud detection

HM Revenue and Customs has signed a £175 million, 10-year agreement with Quantexa to unify fragmented data and strengthen fraud detection. The deployment is designed to automate routine work while keeping decisions transparent, auditable and subject to human approval.

Us supercomputers test new Artificial Intelligence chip suppliers

Sandia National Laboratories is evaluating chips from Israeli startup NextSilicon as major chipmakers shift their roadmaps toward Artificial Intelligence. The move reflects growing concern that mainstream processors are deprioritizing the scientific computing features government labs still need.

EU Artificial Intelligence Act amendments delay some deadlines and add new bans

A provisional Digital Omnibus on Artificial Intelligence would push back several EU Artificial Intelligence Act deadlines, refine how the law interacts with sector rules, and introduce new prohibited practices. The package also expands limited bias-testing allowances and strengthens centralized oversight for some high-impact systems.

Qwen 3.5 raises concerns about censorship embedded in model weights

A technical analysis of Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen 3.5 points to political censorship circuits embedded directly in the model’s learned weights. The findings highlight operational, compliance, and product risks for startups building on third-party Artificial Intelligence models.

Laptop prices rise as memory shortages hit PCs

Laptop prices are climbing as memory makers redirect production toward data center demand driven by Artificial Intelligence. The squeeze is spreading beyond RAM to graphics memory and SSDs, raising costs across the PC market.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.