Quantum physicists shrink and de-censor DeepSeek R1 artificial intelligence model

Multiverse Computing says it used quantum-inspired methods to compress DeepSeek R1 into a smaller model that removes built-in Chinese censorship. The team tested the modified model on politically sensitive prompts and used GPT-5 to judge the degree of censorship.

Multiverse Computing, a Spanish firm that applies quantum-inspired Artificial Intelligence techniques, says it has created DeepSeek R1 Slim, a version of the reasoning model that is about 55 percent smaller than the original DeepSeek R1 and that the researchers claim is freed of official Chinese censorship. The team used tensor networks, a mathematical approach from quantum physics that represents data with high-dimensional grids, to compress the model and produce a compact representation that exposes correlations across the model’s parameters.

Using the tensor network “map,” Multiverse researchers say they could identify and selectively remove specific bits of information before fine-tuning the compressed model so its outputs remain close to the original. To evaluate the result, the researchers assembled roughly 25 prompts on topics known to be restricted in Chinese models, including a meme referencing President Xi Jinping and the 1989 Tiananmen events. They compared responses from the modified model and the original DeepSeek R1, and asked OpenAI’s GPT-5 to rate the degree of censorship. Multiverse reports that the uncensored Slim model produced factual answers comparable to Western models.

The work is framed as part of a broader effort to make large models more efficient. Roman Orús, Multiverse’s cofounder and chief scientific officer, says compressed models can approach the original performance while saving energy and cost. The company contrasts its quantum-inspired approach with other compression techniques such as distillation, quantization, and pruning. External researchers note the challenge of shrinking large models without losing capability, and say the quantum-inspired math may reduce redundancy more precisely.

Observers caution that claims to have fully removed censorship may be overstated. Thomas Cao at Tufts says censorship is woven into many stages of model development and is dynamic. Academic work by Jennifer Pan and Xu Xu has found higher rates of censorship in models created in China, especially for Chinese-language prompts. Multiverse plans further compression work on mainstream open-source models, while critics urge broader evaluation beyond a small test set before declaring censorship eliminated.

55

Impact Score

Congress weighs Artificial Intelligence transparency rules

Bipartisan lawmakers are pushing a federal transparency standard for the largest Artificial Intelligence models as Congress works on a broader national framework. The proposal aims to increase public trust while avoiding stricter state-by-state requirements and heavier regulation.

Report finds California creative job losses are not driven by Artificial Intelligence

New research from Otis College of Art and Design finds California’s recent creative industry job losses stem from cost pressures and structural shifts, not direct worker displacement by generative Artificial Intelligence. The technology is changing workflows and expectations, but it is largely replacing tasks rather than entire jobs.

U.S. senators propose broader chip tool export ban for Chinese firms

A bipartisan proposal in the U.S. Senate would shift semiconductor equipment controls from specific fabs to targeted Chinese companies and their affiliates. The measure is aimed at cutting off access to advanced lithography and other wafer fabrication tools for firms such as Huawei, SMIC, YMTC, CXMT, and Hua Hong.

Trump executive order targets state Artificial Intelligence laws

Executive Order 14365 lays out a federal strategy to discourage, challenge, and potentially preempt state Artificial Intelligence laws viewed as burdensome. Employers are advised to keep complying with current state and local rules while preparing for regulatory uncertainty in 2026.

Who decides how America uses Artificial Intelligence in war

Stanford experts are divided over how the United States should govern Artificial Intelligence in defense, surveillance, and warfare. Their views converge on one point: decisions with such high stakes cannot be left to companies alone.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.