New test generates an immune health score

Researchers at Yale University created an immune health metric by profiling blood cells, gene expression, and more than 1,300 proteins, then using machine learning to correlate those signals with health. The experimental test aligned with responses to disease and vaccines but is not ready for clinical use.

Researchers led by John Tsang at Yale University are developing a comprehensive test to quantify immune system health, producing a single score they call the immune health metric. Writer David Ewing Duncan, who took the experimental test, described the experience in an article published by MIT Technology Review and Aventine. The effort tackles a long-standing challenge in medicine: defining and measuring what it means to have a healthy immune system, a concept that spans absence of disease, resilience, and the effects of aging.

To ground their scoring system, the team analyzed blood samples from 228 people with immune diseases caused by single-gene mutations alongside 42 people without disease, covering a spectrum of immune health. They performed an unusually broad suite of assays, including measurements of diverse immune cell populations, gene expression in blood cells, and levels of more than 1,300 proteins. Using machine learning, the researchers identified patterns that correlate these measurements with health status, enabling them to assign an immune health metric to each individual.

When applied to participants from other studies, the immune health metric tracked with independent indicators of well-being, including how people respond to diseases, treatments, and vaccines. These findings, published in Nature Medicine last year, suggest that the score captures meaningful aspects of immune function that are difficult to assess with standard clinical tests. The work also underscores how complex the immune system is, involving hundreds of interacting proteins and cell types whose collective behavior influences health.

The researchers envision the test helping to identify people at risk of cancer and other diseases, and to explain why individuals respond differently to therapies and immunizations. However, the approach remains experimental and is not yet suitable for clinical use. For now, those curious about their own immune health score will have to wait as the method undergoes further validation and development.

55

Impact Score

The missing step between Artificial Intelligence hype and profit

Artificial Intelligence companies have built powerful systems and promised sweeping change, but the path from technical progress to real business value remains unclear. Conflicting studies, weak workplace performance, and poor transparency are leaving a critical gap between hype and evidence.

Samsung workers leaked secrets into ChatGPT

Samsung employees reportedly exposed confidential company information while using ChatGPT for coding help and meeting note generation. The incidents highlight the risk of feeding sensitive data into public Artificial Intelligence tools that retain user inputs.

DeepSeek launches new flagship Artificial Intelligence models

DeepSeek has introduced preview versions of its V4 Flash and V4 Pro models, positioning them as its most powerful open-source Artificial Intelligence platform yet. The release renews competition with OpenAI, Anthropic, and major Chinese rivals while drawing fresh attention to the startup’s technical ambitions and regulatory scrutiny.

OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 sharpens coding but trails Anthropic’s Opus 4.7

OpenAI’s latest model upgrade improves coding, tool use, reasoning and token efficiency as the company pushes deeper into enterprise adoption. Early evaluations suggest stronger security performance, but Anthropic’s Opus 4.7 still leads in some important coding areas.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.