Building Artificial Intelligence governance: a strategic partnership in finance

PwC worked with a leading Czech insurance organisation to move Artificial Intelligence initiatives from proof of concept to scalable, compliant deployments by co-creating a governance framework aligned with the EU Artificial Intelligence Act.

Our client, a leading financial organisation in the insurance sector in the Czech Republic, faced limited visibility into ongoing and planned Artificial Intelligence initiatives and insufficient documentation to manage related risks. These gaps were compounded by an urgent need to comply with the EU Artificial Intelligence Act and other legislative requirements. The organisation also lacked internal capacity to meet the interdisciplinary demands of regulatory compliance and had a limited understanding of standardized processes and guidelines for Artificial Intelligence projects.

PwC adopted an agile, co‑creative approach that began with a comprehensive assessment of the client’s existing Artificial Intelligence landscape across IT, legal, data governance and education functions. That assessment informed a strategic Artificial Intelligence governance framework that laid out ethical implementation guidelines, compliance measures based on legal norms and security standards, and an AI methodology manual providing standard work procedures for managing projects. Practical work included technological assessments and a gap analysis to reconcile departmental needs with new regulatory requirements and to establish repeatable processes for moving from pilot proof of concept projects to full‑scale implementations.

The engagement produced a clear roadmap and documentation that transformed the client’s Artificial Intelligence practice and positioned the organisation to scale applications methodically and securely. Outcomes included improved operational efficiency, enhanced regulatory readiness and greater organisational flexibility for sustained compliance. The case underscores the role of interdisciplinary collaboration and agile methods in navigating complex regulatory environments and highlights a replicable model for financial organisations seeking to operationalise Artificial Intelligence while staying within compliance boundaries. PwC partner Tomáš Fiala described the work as demonstrating how robust Artificial Intelligence governance both meets regulation and enables growth.

68

Impact Score

Nvidia acquisition of SchedMD raises Slurm neutrality concerns

Nvidia’s purchase of SchedMD has given it control of Slurm, an open-source scheduler that sits at the center of many supercomputing and large-model training systems. Researchers and engineers are watching for signs that support could tilt toward Nvidia hardware over AMD and Intel alternatives.

Mustafa Suleyman says Artificial Intelligence compute growth is still accelerating

Mustafa Suleyman argues that Artificial Intelligence development is being propelled by simultaneous advances in chips, memory, networking, and software efficiency rather than nearing a hard limit. He contends that rising compute capacity and falling deployment costs will push systems beyond chatbots toward more capable agents.

China and the US are leading different Artificial Intelligence races

The US leads in large language models and advanced chips, while China has built a major advantage in robotics and humanoid manufacturing. That balance is shifting as Chinese developers narrow the gap in model performance and both countries push to combine software and machines.

Congress weighs Artificial Intelligence transparency rules

Bipartisan lawmakers are pushing a federal transparency standard for the largest Artificial Intelligence models as Congress works on a broader national framework. The proposal aims to increase public trust while avoiding stricter state-by-state requirements and heavier regulation.

Report finds California creative job losses are not driven by Artificial Intelligence

New research from Otis College of Art and Design finds California’s recent creative industry job losses stem from cost pressures and structural shifts, not direct worker displacement by generative Artificial Intelligence. The technology is changing workflows and expectations, but it is largely replacing tasks rather than entire jobs.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.