First Steps to Compliance: Meeting Early Obligations Under the EU AI Act

Explore how businesses can adapt to the early compliance demands of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act to navigate its regulatory landscape.

The EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act, effective from August 2024, is the first broad regulatory framework for AI worldwide. While most provisions will apply by mid-2026, crucial parts became effective in early 2025, including defining AI systems and prohibiting certain practices. These changes kick off a new regulatory environment for AI in Europe, requiring companies to align their AI operations with these regulations.

To aid compliance, the European Commission has this year issued guidance, covering AI system definitions and forbidden AI activities. Two significant initial obligations for businesses include fostering AI literacy and understanding the prohibited utilizations of AI. AI literacy is a compliance mandate under the Act, requiring organizations to ensure their teams are educated about AI and its associated risks.

The AI Act defines systems based on their lifecycle and functionality. It prohibits activities exploiting vulnerabilities or enabling social scoring, putting businesses on notice to scrutinize their AI applications carefully. Understanding these requirements will help companies navigate compliance and reduce legal risks, establishing a culture of safe AI usage.

79

Impact Score

China and the US are leading different Artificial Intelligence races

The US leads in large language models and advanced chips, while China has built a major advantage in robotics and humanoid manufacturing. That balance is shifting as Chinese developers narrow the gap in model performance and both countries push to combine software and machines.

Congress weighs Artificial Intelligence transparency rules

Bipartisan lawmakers are pushing a federal transparency standard for the largest Artificial Intelligence models as Congress works on a broader national framework. The proposal aims to increase public trust while avoiding stricter state-by-state requirements and heavier regulation.

Report finds California creative job losses are not driven by Artificial Intelligence

New research from Otis College of Art and Design finds California’s recent creative industry job losses stem from cost pressures and structural shifts, not direct worker displacement by generative Artificial Intelligence. The technology is changing workflows and expectations, but it is largely replacing tasks rather than entire jobs.

U.S. senators propose broader chip tool export ban for Chinese firms

A bipartisan proposal in the U.S. Senate would shift semiconductor equipment controls from specific fabs to targeted Chinese companies and their affiliates. The measure is aimed at cutting off access to advanced lithography and other wafer fabrication tools for firms such as Huawei, SMIC, YMTC, CXMT, and Hua Hong.

Trump executive order targets state Artificial Intelligence laws

Executive Order 14365 lays out a federal strategy to discourage, challenge, and potentially preempt state Artificial Intelligence laws viewed as burdensome. Employers are advised to keep complying with current state and local rules while preparing for regulatory uncertainty in 2026.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.