AI Is Killing the Junior Role. You’re Either Useful or You’re Next

AI isn't eliminating junior roles — it's replacing them right now. If you're not bringing value beyond what a model can do in 12 seconds, you're already obsolete. Get useful, or get out of the way.

Let’s cut the pretense: AI isn’t “going to disrupt junior jobs someday.” It already is. Entry-level roles are being gutted in silence, not because of a technological future, but because of a present-day reality where large language models and automation tools outperform junior hires at 80% of the tasks they were brought in to do.

What used to be “great learning opportunities” are now just automatable chores. Writing first drafts? Summarizing reports? Creating pitch decks? Pulling data from ten sources and slapping it into a slide? All of it’s being done faster, cheaper, and with fewer complaints by AI.

And the companies? They’ve noticed. HR isn’t screaming about it on LinkedIn because it doesn’t make for heartwarming posts — but behind the scenes, the bottom tier is being phased out.

You want a junior role in 2025? You’d better bring senior-level clarity with you.

Most junior jobs weren’t about insight — they were about doing repetitive garbage no one else had time for. AI eats that for breakfast. It doesn’t get bored. It doesn’t need context. It just does the task. Over and over. At scale.

“We’ll have the intern do it.”
→ Replaced by: “Just run it through ChatGPT.”

You don’t get a job anymore just because you’re willing. You need to be better than the machine. Otherwise, you’re not a hire — you’re overhead.

This Isn’t a Phase. It’s a Filter.

Junior roles aren’t evolving. They’re evaporating.
What’s replacing them isn’t a new tier — it’s nothing. The expectation is that you’ll train yourself using AI, automation tools, and what’s left of the internet. No one’s holding your hand. There is no ladder anymore — just a drop, and a ledge. Climb or fall.

What Survives?

  1. Execution With Judgment.
    If you can take a tool’s output, validate it, refine it, and make a call — you’re useful. If you’re asking ChatGPT for answers without questioning them, you’re already irrelevant.

  2. Systems Thinkers.
    People who build workflows around AI, not just run prompts. If you’re the person duct-taping APIs together into a working machine — you’re still needed. If you’re just the one pressing the button? You’re not.

  3. Signal Over Noise.
    If you understand what actually matters — to clients, to outcomes, to operations — and can trim the fat, you’re not replaceable. Everyone else is just noise with a keyboard.

What’s Gone?

  • “Eager to learn” without ability? Gone.

  • “Willing to do anything”? AI already is.

  • “Looking to grow into the role”? The role’s already dead.

You are expected to show up functional. Not perfect — but effective. You should already know how to write, summarize, automate, ask smart questions, and use tools that didn’t exist two years ago. If you don’t — someone cheaper, faster, and non-human does.

AI didn’t kill opportunity. It raised the price of entry. You’re not being excluded — you’re being tested. Silently. Constantly. And the test is brutal: either you provide leverage, or you are replaced by it.

Get on board, or get out of the way.

Christian Holmgreen is the Founder of Epium and holds a Master’s in Computer Science with a focus on AI. He’s worked with neural networks since the ’90s.

AGI Is Not Around the Corner: Why Today’s LLMs Aren’t True Intelligence

Today’s LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude are impressive pattern-recognition tools, but they’re not anywhere near true intelligence. Despite the hype, they lack core AGI traits like reasoning, autonomy, and real-world understanding. This article cuts through the noise, explaining why fears of imminent AGI are wildly premature.

Real AI Automation Isn’t a Prompt. It’s a Pipeline

AI isn’t about calling the biggest model — it’s about building smart, layered systems that use the right model for the right job. This real-world automation pulls, scrapes, filters, deduplicates, scores, summarizes, and publishes — using GPT-4.1, GPT-4o, 4o-mini, and DALL·E 3 where they shine, not just where they’re trendy.

How to Tell If an AI Tool Is Worth Paying For

Don’t fall for the $999 AI tools being pushed by Instagram bros and TikTok grifters — if it’s just a glorified ChatGPT call in a shiny box, you’re being upsold on laziness. Real value comes from integration, automation at scale, and actual technical depth — not viral bullshit.