US Court Reopens Dispute Over CRISPR Patent Ownership

The US Court of Appeals gives Nobel-winning scientists another chance to claim vital CRISPR gene-editing patents, while police sidestep facial recognition bans using new Artificial Intelligence tools.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has reignited the high-stakes legal battle over ownership of foundational CRISPR gene-editing patents. Scientists Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, co-recipients of the 2020 Nobel Prize for their groundbreaking CRISPR work, have been granted another opportunity to argue their case for controlling patents that are crucial to the biotechnology industry. Since their system is already applied in treating various health disorders, the control of these patents has significant scientific and financial implications.

This case stems from the 2014 grant of US CRISPR rights to Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, a decision that sparked years of contention regarding both intellectual property and the future of gene-editing technologies. Hundreds of millions of dollars and considerable prestige are involved, making the outcome critical for the biotech sector. The ongoing patent disputes stretch beyond the US as Doudna and Charpentier previously moved to withdraw their European CRISPR patents. Developments in CRISPR´s use, including consumer products like gene-edited pigs and advancements in making treatments more accessible, underscore the importance of clear patent ownership.

In parallel, recent revelations detail how US police departments are leveraging new Artificial Intelligence-driven surveillance tools that circumvent existing bans on facial recognition technology. Instead of relying on facial features, law enforcement agencies are utilizing attributes such as body size, gender, hair color and style, clothing, and accessories for identification and tracking. This new approach enables police to continue expansive surveillance despite growing legal restrictions, raising fresh questions about the adequacy of regulatory frameworks and civil rights protections in the age of Artificial Intelligence. This shift in police technology showcases how departments are adapting rapidly and highlights broader debates about oversight as Artificial Intelligence plays a growing role in daily operations.

82

Impact Score

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.

Please check your email for a Verification Code sent to . Didn't get a code? Click here to resend