Swedish prime minister urges pause on EU´s artificial intelligence rules

Sweden´s leader calls for halting EU artificial intelligence rules, citing confusion and lack of common standards ahead of a key Brussels summit.

Swedish prime minister Ulf Kristersson has publicly called for a pause in the European Union´s new artificial intelligence rules, known as the AI Act, ahead of a meeting with EU leaders in Brussels this week. Kristersson argued that the rulebook is ´confusing´ and highlighted the absence of common technical standards, which he believes should be addressed before continuing the rollout of the legislation. This marks the first instance of a government leader formally urging a halt to the implementation of the AI Act, despite prior expressions of concern from officials in countries like the Czech Republic and Poland.

Speaking during a meeting with Swedish parliament members, Kristersson criticized the EU´s approach, stating that bringing the AI Act into force without harmonized standards risks Europe falling behind technologically or certain applications becoming unavailable in the European market. He intends to raise these concerns at the European Council meeting, emphasizing the need for regulatory clarity and cohesion before moving forward with such significant regulations.

The idea of delaying the AI Act has started to gain momentum in Brussels. Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission´s technology chief, has indicated that a pause could be considered if the necessary technical guidance is not finalized in time. The AI Act, which became law last year, is being implemented over the next year and a half and relies heavily on technical standards related to cybersecurity and human oversight. Conservative Swedish European Parliament member Arba Kokalari supported Kristersson´s stance, arguing that portions of the AI Act should be suspended if standards are not ready and proposing that the law be part of the Commission´s forthcoming digital simplification package. Until now, lawmakers have mostly resisted halting the rollout of the carefully crafted law, but the debate appears to be shifting as practical implementation challenges come to the forefront.

67

Impact Score

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.

Please check your email for a Verification Code sent to . Didn't get a code? Click here to resend