US Court Revives CRISPR Patent Battle Between Doudna, Charpentier and Broad Institute

Ownership of foundational CRISPR gene-editing patents is back under scrutiny after a US court ruled Doudna and Charpentier deserve another shot at their claim.

The ongoing dispute over who owns the foundational patents for CRISPR gene-editing technology has been reignited following a recent decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On Monday, the court announced that Nobel laureates Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, widely credited for co-discovering the gene-editing tool, will have another opportunity to argue that they deserve key patents on what many view as the defining biotechnology invention of the 21st century.

Doudna and Charpentier, who shared a Nobel Prize in 2020 for their groundbreaking work on CRISPR, faced a setback when the Broad Institute’s Feng Zhang was awarded core US patent rights in 2014. This allocation sparked a protracted, high-stakes battle involving not only major financial interests but also scientific prestige. Despite their seminal 2012 publication showing CRISPR´s capacity to cut DNA in a test tube, the controversy centers around which group was the first to successfully apply CRISPR to edit DNA in animal cells, an achievement both parties claim from the same year.

In 2022, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board determined Doudna and Charpentier had not fully conceived the application of CRISPR in animal cells, in part because they struggled initially to make the technology work in various species. Broad´s Zhang, meanwhile, published a successful demonstration in human cells in 2013. On appeal, however, the Federal Circuit court found that the earlier ruling used an incorrect legal standard, holding that Doudna and Charpentier did not need certainty their invention would work, but rather that it did ultimately function as intended. With the case heading back to the patent board for reconsideration, both the University of California, Berkeley, and the Broad Institute have reaffirmed their positions. The dispute, involving reexamination of decade-old research notebooks and potential Supreme Court escalation, once again puts the future of CRISPR patent rights up for grabs and could reshape the control and commercialization of gene-editing therapies worldwide.

85

Impact Score

Anumana wins FDA clearance for pulmonary hypertension ECG Artificial Intelligence tool

Anumana has received FDA 510(k) clearance for an Artificial Intelligence-enabled pulmonary hypertension algorithm designed for use with standard 12-lead electrocardiograms. The company says the software can help clinicians spot early signs of disease within existing workflows and without moving patient data outside the health system environment.

Anu Bradford on tech sovereignty and regulatory fragmentation

Anu Bradford argues that Europe is wavering in its role as the world’s digital rule-setter just as governments everywhere move toward more state control over technology. Global companies are being pushed to treat geopolitical risk, data sovereignty, and Artificial Intelligence governance as core strategic issues.

Mistral launches text-to-speech model

Mistral has expanded its Voxtral family with a text-to-speech system aimed at enterprise voice applications. The company is positioning the open-weights model as a flexible alternative for organizations that want more control over deployment, cost and customization.

UK Parliament opens workforce inquiry on Artificial Intelligence

A UK Parliament committee is examining how Artificial Intelligence is changing business and work, with a focus on both economic opportunity and labour disruption. The inquiry is seeking evidence on government priorities as adoption expands across the economy.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.