UK launches review of product liability for emerging tech and Artificial Intelligence

The UK Law Commission will review how product liability laws apply to Artificial Intelligence and digital products, with a more consumer-friendly regime on the agenda.

The UK Law Commission has initiated a significant new review of the national regime governing civil liability for defective products, with a particular focus on emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence. This regime, currently anchored by the Consumer Protection Act 1987, is now under scrutiny amid concerns it is no longer fit for a digital age that includes software-driven and interconnected products. The move follows the EU’s sweeping revamp of its own product liability framework, which has expanded liability to cover software and introduced measures to ease consumer claims.

The UK review gains urgency in the context of Brexit and the subsequent divergence from EU legal frameworks. After a false start in 2023—when reform was mooted but did not materialize in legislation passed earlier in 2025—the Law Commission now plans to address how current law accommodates Artificial Intelligence and to consider proposals that could make it easier for consumers to secure compensation for damages caused by defective digital products. This tracks developments under the new EU Product Liability Directive 2024/2853, which notably shifts the legal burden of proof and recognizes software as a standalone product category.

Early indicators from the Law Commission’s recent discussion papers highlight several gaps: the current legal regime may not clearly cover software, producers of Artificial Intelligence systems provided solely as software may not face adequate liability, and companies in modern, complex supply chains operate under uncertain duties. Furthermore, the Law Commission cites persistent difficulties consumers face in holding producers accountable, pointing out the existing framework’s failure to balance the goals of harm prevention, business support, and the fostering of innovation. The next phase of the review will involve consultation with key stakeholders and is expected to accelerate rapidly, with ministers seeking an initial report by 2026. The outcome could reshape the legal landscape for technology product liability in the UK, potentially moving toward a more pro-consumer and technologically-enabled approach.

68

Impact Score

European Union delays key Artificial Intelligence Act obligations

European Union lawmakers have agreed to revise the Artificial Intelligence Act, delaying major high-risk compliance obligations and easing some overlapping requirements. The changes give businesses more time to prepare while preserving the law’s core framework for high-risk systems and transparency rules.

HMRC signs £175m Quantexa deal for fraud detection

HM Revenue and Customs has signed a £175 million, 10-year agreement with Quantexa to unify fragmented data and strengthen fraud detection. The deployment is designed to automate routine work while keeping decisions transparent, auditable and subject to human approval.

Us supercomputers test new Artificial Intelligence chip suppliers

Sandia National Laboratories is evaluating chips from Israeli startup NextSilicon as major chipmakers shift their roadmaps toward Artificial Intelligence. The move reflects growing concern that mainstream processors are deprioritizing the scientific computing features government labs still need.

EU Artificial Intelligence Act amendments delay some deadlines and add new bans

A provisional Digital Omnibus on Artificial Intelligence would push back several EU Artificial Intelligence Act deadlines, refine how the law interacts with sector rules, and introduce new prohibited practices. The package also expands limited bias-testing allowances and strengthens centralized oversight for some high-impact systems.

Qwen 3.5 raises concerns about censorship embedded in model weights

A technical analysis of Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen 3.5 points to political censorship circuits embedded directly in the model’s learned weights. The findings highlight operational, compliance, and product risks for startups building on third-party Artificial Intelligence models.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.