Nearly 60 percent of consumers now use artificial intelligence to shop, reshaping retail dynamics

Nearly 60 percent of consumers rely on artificial intelligence for shopping decisions, outpacing trust in friends and reshaping strategies for brands.

The shopping landscape is undergoing a seismic transformation as nearly 60 percent of consumers now use artificial intelligence to guide their purchasing decisions. According to recent Bloomreach surveys highlighted by Professor Luca Cian of the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, artificial intelligence is not just assisting but often superseding the role of personal networks, with nearly half of respondents trusting artificial intelligence more than friends for style advice. This rapid adoption reflects a broader trend where artificial intelligence is embedded as a decision-making ´copilot,´ streamlining comparisons, filtering choices, and adjusting recommendations for each user.

Professor Cian, a behavioral scientist specializing in marketing and technology, explains that artificial intelligence enables what he describes as ‘augmented decision-making’. Consumers are now offloading the overwhelming task of sorting through countless options, which compresses what was once a lengthy consideration and comparison process into swift, confidence-boosted choices. With 77% of users stating artificial intelligence helps them make faster decisions, the old marketing funnel is rendered obsolete. The influence of a brand must be established at the earliest stages of consideration, often before a traditional campaign would even have started.

Trust, however, is nuanced. While survey data indicate that people consider artificial intelligence a more objective advisor—attributed to its lack of human emotional bias—this trust wanes for decisions that carry deep personal or emotional weight. Artificial intelligence may be a welcome authority on fashion, but it is not yet poised to handle the most intimate consumer choices. From a marketing perspective, brands need to shift their strategies to appeal not only to consumers but also to artificial intelligence systems acting as recommendation gatekeepers. Marketers must understand contexts where artificial intelligence excels—such as practical purchases—while recognizing circumstances where human input prevails, especially for hedonic products. Over-reliance on automation can backfire if it eliminates clarity or erodes personal engagement. As artificial intelligence grows in personalization and proactivity, brands will be challenged not only to win consumer trust but also to navigate the algorithmic preferences of artificial intelligence itself, ensuring transparency, control, and genuine value for end users.

74

Impact Score

Congress weighs Artificial Intelligence transparency rules

Bipartisan lawmakers are pushing a federal transparency standard for the largest Artificial Intelligence models as Congress works on a broader national framework. The proposal aims to increase public trust while avoiding stricter state-by-state requirements and heavier regulation.

Report finds California creative job losses are not driven by Artificial Intelligence

New research from Otis College of Art and Design finds California’s recent creative industry job losses stem from cost pressures and structural shifts, not direct worker displacement by generative Artificial Intelligence. The technology is changing workflows and expectations, but it is largely replacing tasks rather than entire jobs.

U.S. senators propose broader chip tool export ban for Chinese firms

A bipartisan proposal in the U.S. Senate would shift semiconductor equipment controls from specific fabs to targeted Chinese companies and their affiliates. The measure is aimed at cutting off access to advanced lithography and other wafer fabrication tools for firms such as Huawei, SMIC, YMTC, CXMT, and Hua Hong.

Trump executive order targets state Artificial Intelligence laws

Executive Order 14365 lays out a federal strategy to discourage, challenge, and potentially preempt state Artificial Intelligence laws viewed as burdensome. Employers are advised to keep complying with current state and local rules while preparing for regulatory uncertainty in 2026.

Who decides how America uses Artificial Intelligence in war

Stanford experts are divided over how the United States should govern Artificial Intelligence in defense, surveillance, and warfare. Their views converge on one point: decisions with such high stakes cannot be left to companies alone.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.