Most Companies Still Piloting Artificial Intelligence Agents, KPMG Finds

KPMG reports that while interest and budgets for artificial intelligence agents are surging, most companies remain in the pilot phase, citing risk management and workforce readiness as major hurdles.

A new KPMG survey reveals that 65% of U.S. companies are experimenting with artificial intelligence agents—software tools that perform workplace tasks typically handled by humans—up sharply from 37% just last quarter. Despite this significant increase in trial runs, actual full-scale deployment of the technology remains flat at 11%, underscoring continued organizational caution. The heightened experimentation comes as budgets earmarked for generative artificial intelligence are also expanding, with organizations planning sizable investments in the coming year, according to the Big Four accounting firm.

KPMG´s report indicates that companies piloting or deploying artificial intelligence agents focus on tasks such as analyzing complex datasets (78%), administrative duties (66%), call center operations (61%), and recruitment or candidate sourcing (26%). Yet, the technology’s developmental maturity and the potential for operational missteps limit wider rollout. Notably, concerns around risk management remain paramount, with more than eight in ten survey respondents expecting it to be the most significant barrier to artificial intelligence adoption through the remainder of 2025. Data privacy and security have emerged as top decision factors, with the proportion of executives citing them as critical when choosing providers jumping from 43% last quarter to 73% now.

Workforce adaptation is also a pressing challenge, as over 60% of participants anticipate employee training difficulties stemming from the complexity of artificial intelligence systems. KPMG emphasizes that, as this technology evolves, companies must address foundational issues in data infrastructure and talent development to realize measurable business value. The findings are echoed in separate research from cybersecurity firm Delinea, which highlights a sharp increase in cyber threats targeting non-human digital identities—such as bots and artificial intelligence agents—even as human identities remain prime attack targets. This confluence of operational, security, and workforce challenges is slowing the path to widespread artificial intelligence agent adoption, even as organizations ramp up their exploratory efforts and investment.

55

Impact Score

Nvidia acquisition of SchedMD raises Slurm neutrality concerns

Nvidia’s purchase of SchedMD has given it control of Slurm, an open-source scheduler that sits at the center of many supercomputing and large-model training systems. Researchers and engineers are watching for signs that support could tilt toward Nvidia hardware over AMD and Intel alternatives.

Mustafa Suleyman says Artificial Intelligence compute growth is still accelerating

Mustafa Suleyman argues that Artificial Intelligence development is being propelled by simultaneous advances in chips, memory, networking, and software efficiency rather than nearing a hard limit. He contends that rising compute capacity and falling deployment costs will push systems beyond chatbots toward more capable agents.

China and the US are leading different Artificial Intelligence races

The US leads in large language models and advanced chips, while China has built a major advantage in robotics and humanoid manufacturing. That balance is shifting as Chinese developers narrow the gap in model performance and both countries push to combine software and machines.

Congress weighs Artificial Intelligence transparency rules

Bipartisan lawmakers are pushing a federal transparency standard for the largest Artificial Intelligence models as Congress works on a broader national framework. The proposal aims to increase public trust while avoiding stricter state-by-state requirements and heavier regulation.

Report finds California creative job losses are not driven by Artificial Intelligence

New research from Otis College of Art and Design finds California’s recent creative industry job losses stem from cost pressures and structural shifts, not direct worker displacement by generative Artificial Intelligence. The technology is changing workflows and expectations, but it is largely replacing tasks rather than entire jobs.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.