Is cybercrime the new aml in the boardroom

Board-level attention to cybercrime is rising, driven by findings in the diligent 2025 governance trends report and the boardroom resilience 2025 whitepaper. Generative Artificial Intelligence has expanded the attack surface, which the article links to rising costs and operational vulnerabilities.

The article argues that cybercrime has moved beyond an IT concern to an existential boardroom issue, citing the diligent 2025 governance trends report and the boardroom resilience 2025 whitepaper. It notes projected growth in cybercrime costs – reported as a 50% increase between 2024 and 2028 – but the precise cost figures in the source are not stated. The piece lists impacts that now flow directly to valuation and survival, including stolen funds, data destruction, intellectual property theft, business disruption, reputational damage, and regulatory fines.

Key drivers elevating cyber risk include the growing role of digital assets in company valuation and the rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence, which the article says has expanded attack surfaces by 67 percent. The article highlights a real-world operational example: a faulty update in July 2024 that affected 8.5 million Microsoft systems via a CrowdStrike outage. It also reports that related insurance cost estimates in the source are not stated and that, had the incident been malicious, the damage could have been substantially larger. The overall message is that more systems mean more vulnerabilities and that cyber events can immediately erode enterprise value.

The article sets out concrete board actions: treat infrastructure upgrades as high-risk events, implement robust change management for software and systems, deploy real-time dashboards to monitor cyber posture, make cybersecurity a standing board agenda item, and engage directly with chief information security officers and risk officers rather than only IT leads. The final comparison frames cybercrime as following the same trajectory as anti-money laundering, evolving from a niche compliance issue to a top governance priority, and warns that boards that fail to adapt risk not just fines but potential existential failure.

72

Impact Score

Computing’s bright young minds and cleaning up satellite streaks

MIT Technology Review highlights the computing innovators under 35 who are building new artificial intelligence chips, datasets and safety assessments. The vera rubin observatory is already grappling with satellite streaks that could mar a large share of its images.

Norway 2025 government artificial intelligence playbook

Norway moved from talk to build on artificial intelligence in 2025, naming Nkom as national supervisor, launching KI-Norge and beginning obligations under the EU artificial intelligence act. Expect mandatory DPIAs, 72-hour breach reporting and centralised oversight tied to accreditation and sandboxes.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.