The AI Risk Gap: Business Coverage and a Changing Regulatory Landscape

Rapid Artificial Intelligence adoption is creating new risks for businesses, but insurance and regulations struggle to keep up.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming integral to business operations across sectors, with 79% of surveyed companies already using the technology and many planning increased reliance in the near future. Applications span diverse areas, including data analytics, research, price modelling, and customer service, making AI a core driver of efficiency and innovation. Despite its rapid uptake, this technological surge is also introducing a fresh array of business risks, intensified by a global regulatory landscape that is evolving at different speeds and in varying directions.

Legislative frameworks worldwide are beginning to catch up. The EU has led with its comprehensive AI Act, classifying systems by their risk level and establishing a structured legal foundation intended to encourage responsible innovation. Canada’s efforts to implement a similar nationwide Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) have stalled, resulting in a province-led regulatory patchwork. The United Kingdom has opted for a more flexible, sector-based regulatory approach, advocating for innovation by leveraging existing regulatory bodies rather than imposing sweeping new laws. Meanwhile, the United States manages AI risk through a mix of federal and state-level initiatives, and Australia is strengthening mandatory guardrails, especially for high-risk scenarios. For international enterprises, these fragmented and regionally distinct regulatory regimes represent a significant compliance challenge, further complicating the risk profile associated with artificial intelligence adoption.

The majority of businesses, however, remain underprepared for these evolving risks. Only 32% of those surveyed by CFC feel confident that their existing insurance policies adequately address exposures generated by artificial intelligence, from intellectual property disputes to data breaches and regulatory infractions. The ´AI risk gap´ thus highlights a market-wide lack of clarity in insurance coverage at a time when the use of the technology is nearly ubiquitous. Insurance providers such as CFC are responding by embedding explicit and implied protections for artificial intelligence-related risks across their policies in sectors including healthcare, finance, technology, and media, aiming to support innovation without exposing companies to undue uncertainty or liability. As regulatory scrutiny increases and AI use cases continue to evolve, the need for tailored, comprehensive insurance coverage becomes ever more critical to business resilience.

65

Impact Score

Samsung shows 96% power reduction in NAND flash

Samsung researchers report a design that combines ferroelectric materials with oxide semiconductors to cut NAND flash string-level power by up to 96%. The team says the approach supports high density, including up to 5 bits per cell, and could lower power for data centers and mobile and edge-Artificial Intelligence devices.

the download: fossil fuels and new endometriosis tests

This edition of The Download highlights how this year’s UN climate talks again omitted the phrase “fossil fuels” and why new noninvasive tests could shorten the nearly 10 years it now takes to diagnose endometriosis.

SAP unveils EU Artificial Intelligence Cloud: a unified vision for Europe’s sovereign Artificial Intelligence and cloud future

SAP launched EU Artificial Intelligence Cloud as a sovereign offering that brings together its milestones into a full-stack cloud and Artificial Intelligence framework. The offering supports EU data residency and gives customers flexible sovereignty and deployment choices across SAP data centers, trusted European infrastructure or fully managed on-site solutions.

HPC won’t be an x86 monoculture forever

x86 dominance in high-performance computing is receding – its share of the TOP500 has fallen from almost nine in ten machines a decade ago to 57 percent today. The rise of GPUs, Arm and RISC-V and the demands of Artificial Intelligence and hyperscale workloads are reshaping processor choices.

Contact Us

Got questions? Use the form to contact us.

Contact Form

Clicking next sends a verification code to your email. After verifying, you can enter your message.